Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Journal
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Digital Journal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable news organization by any definition that we use. Really the 2008 source, the Metro free newspaper, is the only one that's any good. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:26, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 05:33, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, i opened all of the refs, it looks a hum drum business, with the refs mentioning how they pay some journalists for submissions and how they set up a new board etc. Notability not established. Szzuk (talk) 21:00, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.